“Bringing Americans Billionaires to Justice since 2001” HOW TO CALCULATE OT BY ADDING BONUS AND BASE TOGETHER Site loads very slow since we are suing the hosting company;) 2/8/2012: Where is Bob Parsons? Are you watching the IBD train wreck? This California Billionaire thought he could use a ponzi scheme con woman as his star witness to manipulate the Court into enforcing a debt peonage contract where employees get paid nothing but a loan on payday but then have to work off debts and have no option to not liquidate the debts. Go look up John and Candace Mayeron and DBSI Securities, they stole lots of money and they need to be in prison. Debt peonage slavery! A 13th Amendment violation Bob!!! Oh I hope you are enjoying this, because you are up next tough guy. We get to address your wage scam scheme next in Court! Watch and learn motorcycle man, watch and learn. Read this PDF Bob, you and your attorneys take notice where lying in Court will get you, it does say debt peonage in this objection filing, and that is slavery. And William J. O’Neil yep he is a multi billionaire just like yourself. The Court cannot enforce this contract without people going to prison: OB4997~1.pdf So once we start a discovery schedule, we are going to trial. And the big tough 193rd richest billionaire in the US will have to explain why Godaddy likes to steal from its own employees on the public record. This is what you get for mugging poor people Bob, eventually one of them fights back. Also stop censoring my website you fucker, that’s a 1st Amendment violation. I know you supported SOPA and PIPA and whatnot, but that failed miserably. How’s Kim Sellner, Chip, Tyler and Brett, still buzzing away stealing from reps with the QA system? A system designed to steal both bonus money, OT and Federal Taxes from employees and the government? Don’t worry you’ll be engulfed in a anti-trust lawsuit with the Government. I can smell it coming. 2/5/2012: DOL releases iPhone App to combat Wage theft: http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/finding_apps_for_the_shadow_economy/ This is great, the DOL will use employees as informants and they will email timesheets directly to the DOL for review. Remember that police force that the DOL hired? Yep they will start raiding companies. So while Bob is surfing the internet looking at Ducati’s and his managers and QA team are busy ripping off the workforce. The DOL could raid the place at anytime. Handcuff and detain the shitheads for questioning. AWESOME. 1/31/2012: Say It Aint so Bob. IBD’s Star Witness shows up as a con-woman, a principal and main actor in a $600 million national TIC (Tennant in Common) Real Estate ponzi scheme fraud, run and administrated by her brother. O’Neil admits on record he used the cash flow of the company to take equity stakes in high growth stocks like Pic n Save (Big Lots!: BIG, NYSE) So the theory that he was investing heavily into leads goes out the window when he was pouring the cash flow into unrelated business models. Should be a good hearing on March 7, 2011!! Wow they lied and manipulated the Court system, to win in Court and beat me, hard to imagine that huh Bob? Shit and that is a bad hand to be dealt with the Feds watching. Well you’re next, hope your people don’t get caught lying. OB4997~1.pdf (objections conformed copy) 1/27/2012: California Court issues order for oral arguments on objections to occur 3/7/2012 in Los Angeles, Plaintiffs will ask court to void and nullify the contract due to Civil Rights and Due Process violations and for improper weighing of evidence and testimony. Additionally unenforceable as an illicit debt peonage contract banned in this country. It would be improper for Plaintiffs to have to appeal out of a “slavery” or Quasi-”slavery” contract. They will invoke protections, against labor based debt liquidation, and strike contract from any further execution. Case Number: BC269313 TOBY HARRIS ET AL VS. INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY INC ET AL Filing Date: 03/01/2002
Case Type: Other Employment Complaint (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending Cases Related: BC274964 on 08/14/2002 Future Hearings 03/07/2012 at 09:00 am in department 39 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Hearing-Oral Argument (re: Objections to Statement ofDecision; Status Conference;) 01/27/2012 in Department 39, Michael C. Solner, Presiding
Court Order - Court makes order MARK YOUR CALENDARS NATIONAL MEDIA! California Attorney General issues letter referring matter to CJP CJP issues letter saying they cannot be involved in any DOJ matter regarding this case. DOJ ties up criminal complaint by putting complaint into internal investigations with Office of Inspector General. Criminal complaint is temporarily stalled from filing. Case moves back to oral arguments in 30 days. Have somebody change your diaper Bob, yep I really did that. Your up next tough guy. So IBD is heading to Court asking to enforce a contract with a banned slavery element in it. Hello Media?? 1/21/2012: Complaint filed with Office of Inspector General at DOL, in Washington D.C. to clear the way for a criminal complaint. The Criminal Director urges to follow an appeal out of slavery enforcement by State of California, that position is declined. And demand to be allowed to file criminal complaint is filed. 1/18/2012: California Court tosses Constitutional argument on debt peonage in tentative ruling. Approves Debt Peonage Slavery contract as conscionable: Whistleblower files charges with DOJ and California Attorney General for Investigation of Treason & Deprivation of Constitutional rights. 60 Minutes asks to review the story. Full information is provided to 60 minutes Investigative reporters and directly to show producer. THE STATEMENT OF DECISION (PDF) PRE TRIAL BRIEF EMPLOYEES (PDF) PRE TRIAL BRIEF IBD (PDF) Note: this is the position and opinion of the main whistleblower in this action: What does this mean? And how did it happen? In pre trial briefing the Plaintiffs raised the issue that the contract was unconscionable due to the fact that employees were put in the position of having to labor off debt amounts to the employer based on 2 theories: They are illegal due to an improper wage assignment which requires “earned” wages and a signed agreement. Employees can never be forced in any labor contract to labor off debt amounts, by physical or legal coercion. It is a Constitutional right under debt peonage. The Court reserved the right to discard the Labor Code 300 (h) wage assignment issue since it was not ever raised in the operative pleading. But heard the argument and the testimony. However a Court cannot toss a Constitutional argument since they are guaranteed rights which can be invoked at any time. It looks like the Judge omitted the debt liquidation argument, but in order to dispose of it, nixed the Constitutional argument, which is a crime against the State. In addition the Judge failed to address how the debt amounts were discharged. The employees pled that they are discharged by adding more labor, taking advances, or direct labor. This Judge just allowed an abolished labor practice to occur when he should have struck down the contract. Additionally, the Judge was put on Notice at trial which mean he loses any Judicial immunity. A Judge cannot rule against any Constitutional right, ever. It is an act of Treason and a Criminal act against the State. A public offical takes the follow oath when sworn in: "I, ___________________________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter. "And I do further swear (or affirm) that I do not advocate, nor am I a member of any party or organization, political or other- wise, that now advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means; that within the five years immediately preceding the taking of this oath (or affirmation) I have not been a member of any party or organization, political or other-wise, that advocated the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means except as follows: ______________________________________________ I will not advocate nor become (name of office) a member of any party or organization, political or otherwise, that advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means." And no other oath, declaration, or test, shall be required as a qualification for any public office or employment. "Public officer and employee" includes every officer and employee of the State, including the University of California, every county, city, city and county, district, and authority, including any department, division, bureau, board, commission, agency, or instrumentality of any of the foregoing. 1/13/2012: California Court issues Ruling in Investor’s Business Daily Case (Harris v. Investor’s Business Daily BC269313 LA Superior Court). We do not yet have a copy of the ruling we are having the attorneys retrieve it online and will upload it with a full analysis by Monday. Hopefully, the Court did not re-instate debt peonage slavery for the Monday Martin Luther King Holiday as that will be very disturbing national news. Hang tight, we will get you the details shortly. MAJOR NATIONAL LEGAL NEWS SOURCE INITIATES NEWS COVERAGE ON CORBIN V. GODADDY LAWSUIT: REQUESTS PUBLIC AND EVIDENCE BASED DOCUMENTS FROM PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL IN ADVANCE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION RULING !!!!! 1/6/2012 (Seriously Bob, they really did. Go pick up a case of Depends, this is really going down tough guy. You are really getting your ass handed to you by poor people. Really, really. This is real talk son.) WAGE THEFT PREVENTION ACT ENACTED IN CALIFORNIA! 11/7/2011: California Governor Jerry Brown passes criminalized wage theft laws in California to take effect in 60 days, Jan 1, 2012. The government now sees non payment of employees as a criminal act and theft. California gears up to start jailing defiant employers. Can somebody change Bob’s diapers, he thought I was joking that this day would come. But looks like wage theft law enforcement is a reality. Don’t worry Bob, Bill is screwed he has a few monster hurdles to clear, he will love the law that allows us to go after him personally, the paystub laws requiring him to mention earnings, jail time for not paying a whistleblower a judgement, jail for being able to afford to pay employees but will-fully refusing, and other fun stuff!!!! I told you so Bob. You know what wage theft is because I educated you on this. Did you idiots really think you were gonna get away with stealing millions of dollars from employees?? Really? Want to take a a wild guess who the front runner is to go to jail first under these new laws? http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/Governor_signs_Wage_Theft_Protection_Act_of_2011.html http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/asm/ab_0451-0500/ab_469_bill_20111009_chaptered.pdf http://www.employmentlawwatch.com/2011/11/articles/employment-us/us-californias-wage-theft-prevention-act-imposes-new-requirements-and-potential-penalties-on-private-employers-starting-january-1-2012/ http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=87de1cf4-a70e-42b3-9bec-cd97b0263d72 EMPLOYEES SUE GODADDY IN CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT FOR OVERTIME CORBIN V GODADDY: NEW 12/31/2011: Hey everyone. First off, this site is getting a massive amount of new traffic from all parts of the country. Our visitors are staying and reading this stuff. Secondly the media is gaining huge interest in the Wage Theft story as a national piece. I want to tell you all that we have submitted and filed a: Motion for Certification for Class Action, and a Third Amended Complaint. The Court has both issues under advisement, and should be ruling on them shortly but let’s discuss whats on the public record. Godaddy has admitted that there are over 5,000 potential victims (By victims I mean wage theft crime victims ripped off by a arrogant billionaire employer who thinks the law does not apply to him), and the class number is huge, this is due to turn-over and current work force. Godaddy is in growth so they are actually growing this legal violation along-side the inherent growth curve of the company. It is a rare situation were our attorneys don’t mind delaying tactics due to the compounding of damages. But as class members we want this litigation resolved so we can move on with our lives. The Third amended complaint includes our IOWA people, this is in dispute with Godaddy they claim that our 5 named plaintiffs cannot speak for the peoples rights they are violating over in Iowa. But we have enough evidence to prove that the same exact violation is occurring and this is a Federal lawsuit so it has no bearing on AZ or IA since Godaddy wanted this argued in Federal District Court. Be-careful what you wish for Godaddy executives, it may cost you more money. Also we included Casey Corbin into a wrongful termination claim. So now our whistleblowers are Toby Harris and Casey Corbin in a concerted effort to stop the wage theft from occurring. This is important as a Federal claim because weirdly the Government allows the firing of 1 whistleblower to be brought as a civil case, but with 2 fired they move to criminal penalties and possible RICO. So the first whistleblower execution is a “freebie” but the second, well Jail time. But thats not the incentive to resolve this case, Godaddy wants to resolve it because they are a good and upright employer right? Not. I think our side actually needed the initial discovery to be able to talk at the negotiation table. And the size and scope is massive, this is a multi million dollar action. The wage theft laws are now being criminalized nationally, we are seeing this all over the country. The Occupy Wall Street people have taken on Wage Theft as an issue to protest, so it is now frowned upon for multi billionaire elephant killer types, to, you know, pocket stolen Overtime and bonus monies from the employees. Bob is a rather shameless asshole, while he is image aware, he doesn’t feel the pain of this action yet. So I am arranging for the Occupy people to go and occupy Godaddy HQ. That should make driving the 600hp Corvette to work fun. I am arranging a media event. I think they will give up eventually, but fuck it, let’s have a little fun ripping Bob down off his throne. Hang in there guys, although we are moving into year 2 of litigation, we have the upper hand in this lawsuit, and they have zero upside in fighting this. Shit look what supporting SOPA did to them, made them look like morons. 12/3/2011: GODADDY’S DEFENSE ATTORNEYS TAKE HUGE INTEREST IN THIS WEBSITE FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY IN LAWSUIT: REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION 08/02/2010: FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (CLICK TO DOWNLOAD) 08/02/2010: FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT EXHIBITS (CLICK TO DOWNLOAD) 08/07/2010: Wrongful Termination Exhibits/ Denial of Benefits (Pdf) 08/09/2010: Leave To Amend Filing (pdf) 08/09/2010 Redline Edit of Complaint (pdf) 08/13/2010 Calculating Rates Document (pdf) 08/16/2010 Attorney Bill (pdf) 8/24/2010 Godaddy filing, no opposition to amend complaint (pdf) 8/24/2010 Current court Docket (pdf) 08/25/2010 MC OPINIONATOR, DRAIN ON THE SYSTEM MP3 08/25/2010 60 page complaint accepted by IRS in Washington DC (PDF) 08/28/2010 MC OPINIONATOR Some call him Bob You should call him Rob MP3 08/28/2010 IRS RESPONDS MOVES 60-page complaint to ICE UNIT IN OGDEN UT 08/30/2010 Nodaddy.com hits #3 in Google keyword search for GODADDY 09/03/2010 Godaddy Loses Unemployment Challenge (PDF) 09/14/2010 Godaddy Motion to Dismiss Part Deux (PDF) Or Godaddy’s Classic circular argument defense! 09/16/2010 Proof for the stupid Godaddy Attorneys any adverse ruling in IBD will be reversed 09/29/2010 Response to Godaddy Motion to Dismiss (PDF) 10/5/2010 Current Court Docket (PDF) 10/5/2010 Godaddy Reply to Response to Motion to Dismiss (PDF) 10/5/2020 Godaddy Motion to Strike (PDF) 10/19/2010 IRS ACKNOWLEDGES COMPLAINT INFO ON GODADDY & ISSUES INDIVIDUAL CLAIM NUMBERS AGAINST 15 EXECUTIVES AND THE COMPANY FIRST 6 HERE REDACTED (PDF) 03/02/2011: COURT ORDER MOTION TO DISMISS 03/19/2011: MOTION TO WITHDRAW, PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL MOTION TO TOLL FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT SUPPLEMENT FOR MOTION TO WITHDRAW 04/11/2011: ORDER COURT GRANT PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO WITHDRAW COUNSEL AND GRANTS MOTION TO ALLOW 30 EXTRA DAYS TO FILE 2nd AMENDED COMPLAINT 4/12/2011: COURT UPDATES DOCKET TO SHOW PLAINTIFFS HAVE NO COUNCIL AND ARE CURRENTLY PRO SE 5/10/2011: GODADDY EMPLOYEES BEEF UP LEGAL TEAM ADD 3 LAW FIRMS INCLUDING TOP US OVERTIME LAWYER, MARK THIERMAN 5/10/2011: GODADDY EMPLOYEES REQUEST ADDITIONAL 2 WEEKS TO FILE 2nd AMENDED COMPLAINT 5/11/2011: EMPLOYEES FILE TIMELY 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT 5/18/2011: JUDGE ISSUES ORDER 6/1/2011: GODADDY FINALLY ANSWERS COMPLAINT WITH DENIAL NEW 6/4/2011: COURT ORDER CASE MANAGEMENT 6/4/2011: CURRENT DOCKET 6/10/2011: GODADDY ADDS OUTSIDE COUNSEL #2 #3 7/8/2011: GODADDDY BUYS NODADDY TO SHUT DOWN TOP RANKED GRIPE SITE: Domain nodaddy.com: GoDaddy.com, Inc. 14455 N Hayden Road Suite 226 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260 US Administrative contact: Technical contact: Billing contact: GoDaddy.com, Inc. GoDaddy.com, Inc.  14455 N Hayden Road Suite 226 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260 US Phone: +1.4805058800 Fax: +1.4805058844 Record dates: Record created on: 2000-12-08 09:05:02 UTC Record modified on: 2011-07-08 13:05:13 UTC Record expires on: 2016-12-08 UTC Nameservers: ns26.domaincontrol.com: ns25.domaincontrol.com: HARRIS ASKS HIS ATTORNEYS TO ADD TO DISCOVERY, FOR EVIDENCE OF DOCUMENT AND EVIDENCE DESTRUCTION, FURTHER POST RETALIATION, CENSORSHIP OF FREE SPEECH BOB SHOT THE ELEPHANT DOWN 7/10/ 2011: GODADDY ATTEMPTS TO HIDE NODADDY TRANSFER AND REGISTRATION BY PRIVATE PROXY. WAS “NODADDY” BOUGHT FOR EVIDENCE TAMPERING OF THE LAWSUIT? THAT WILL BE SOME TOUGH QUESTIONS FOR THEM AND THE NEW WALL STREET GUYS IN DISCOVERY! JUST LIKE A CAT SCRATCHING AROUND IN IT’S LITTER BOX TRYING TO BURY THE POOP WATCH BELOW AS GODADDY TAKES POSSESION OF NODADDY AND ATTEMPTS TO HIDE THE REGISTRATION THE FOLLOWING DAY. THANKS ROHAN AND FYODOR FOR ANNOUNCING THE TRANSFER DATE AND TIPPING US OFF;) BEFORE (PDF) AFTER (PDF) 7/12/2011: GODADDY CONFIRMS PURCHASE OF NODADDY GRIPE WEBSITE, ATTEMPTED LAWSUIT COVER-UP IS CAUGHT BY MEDIA: http://domainincite.com/confirmed-go-daddy-bought-nodaddy-com/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/12/godaddy_shuts_down_nodaddy/ Go Daddy no-no means No Daddy is no-go High-ranking gripe nemesis nabbed by target By Kevin Murphy Posted in Hosting, 12th July 2011 09:34 GMT Free whitepaper – Effect of UPS on System Availability Go Daddy has managed to effectively gag its fiercest critics by acquiring and then shutting down the high-ranking Go Daddy gripe site: NoDaddy.com. For over four years, No Daddy hosted a forum detailing a range of "horror stories" submitted by Go Daddy customers and disgruntled current and former employees. Insecure.com opened the site in 2007 to protest Go Daddy's unilateral decision to seize the domain name SecLists.org, after MySpace complained that thousands of hacked user passwords had been posted to a security mailing list archived there. NoDaddy's owners announced the closure of the site on 1 July. They wrote: "What started to document the improper suspension of SecLists.Org grew to cover dozens of other GoDaddy scandals including shill bidding on their own domain auctions, improperly blocking users from transferring domains to other registrars, sexual harassment, constant objectification of women, killing elephants for promotional purposes, etc. We're hopeful that GoDaddy's new owners will stop these shenanigans." They did not disclose that the shut-down would also see the site's web address transferred to Go Daddy.  Over the weekend, the Whois record for the domain name nodaddy.com started briefly displaying Go Daddy's contact information (see screen grab above) before switching to Domains By Proxy, a privacy service owned by Go Daddy. "Sometime in July we reached an agreement between Insecure.Com LLC and GoDaddy.com to transfer the domain name NoDaddy.com," a Go Daddy spokesperson confirmed. The shut-down announcement coincided with Go Daddy's agreement to a landmark investment deal [1] valued at a reported $2.25bn, with KKR, Silver Lake and Technology Crossover Ventures. The deal saw Go Daddy founder Bob Parsons reduce his stake in the company to below 50 per cent for the first time, though he remains the largest shareholder. He also became executive chairman, handing the CEO mantle to COO Warren Adelman. Go Daddy did not confirm or deny that the NoDaddy deal came at the behest of its new owners. The site's former owner did not respond to a request for comment. NoDaddy, until its closure last week, appeared in the top five results on Google whenever anyone searched for the term "Go Daddy". The site's forum was in recent months dominated by hundreds of vitriolic posts from one Toby Harris, who briefly worked in the company's Arizona call centre and is now suing the company [2] for what he calls "wage theft" over allegedly mishandled overtime payments. Harris told us in an email he plans to make the transfer of NoDaddy a "major discovery issue" in his class action lawsuit, which is currently in the pretrial evidence discovery phase. ® 7/15/2011 The world begins holding corrupt billionaires accountable, first-up, the billionaire news and media moguls, Rupert Murdoch. They are very combustible and their entire organization goes up in flames pretty damn quickly. And look how quick the Feds hop in when the public creates opposition. One guy blogging, nothing. Lots of people complaining, the angry villagers tear down an empire. Just like medieval times, very interesting. Well they should learn from others mistakes, that compliance is not a bad thing. Well we might as well add William J. O’Neil to the mix: http://warriorspearl.newsvine.com/_news/2011/07/15/7092713-news-corp-scandal-heads-roll-2-ceos-resign-dow-jones-news-corp?threadId=3174789&commentId=56017767#comments 7/16/2011: BOTH PARTIES FILE JOINT LAWSUIT SUMMARY (PDF) Godaddy says they would like to seize Toby Harris’s home computer for ESI Discovery, Harris tells attorneys that he would like Bob Parsons and all Executives work and home computers, also. There is probably more interesting stuff on a billionaires computer than a telemarketer’s computer. Bob, seriously, if you want my Japanese bukkake porn collection and free Fool Funnel music, we can just swap hard drives, we don’t need to do all this silly stuff like asking the Court to take my personal property, I have rights. People keep their entire lives on their computers these days and I never used it for work....Oh yeah you are the omnipotent billionaire, where rules and common reasoning do not apply. Almost forgot who I was dealing with. Employees attorneys, make statement to the Court that we do not have enough information to begin any type of settlement talks yet. We need Godaddy to turn over payroll, employee and Overtime data. Also we tell the Court that we will be seeking class certification and then filing a summary Judgment, and Godaddy will also be filing a Summary Judgment. Which means we would not even go to trial we would just have the Court decide the issue. 7/19/2011: PLAINTIFFS DISCLOSURE (PDF) DEFENDANTS DISCLOSURE (PDF) First off, I put Google analytics on the website, and now have a picture of the readers and audience and there are a lot of you. And the ones in Washington DC are either Feds or National Media, so welcome. This case will end first round discovery, and I will predict the reason why: Payroll Fraud, Conspiracy to commit payroll fraud, Conspiracy to circumvent FLSA labor provisions, Fraudulent Schemes and artifices That’s it folks thats the case. Can’t put fraudulent indicators on a payroll stub designed to deceive or mislead the employee into thinking his earnings are legally compliant. If “BONUS OT” is on the payroll stub it better be accurate. This will amount to tens of thousands of violations. They will go down in burning flames in the civil case, and quickly try to resolve the issue before the Feds get the evidence and indict them and start a criminal case. Why do large companies game the system for OT? Because the Government has its head up it’s ass on enforcing these violations. And if somebody gave you the ability to rob a bank for millions of dollars and zero risk of prosecution you would do it also. It’s “free labor” any company that can get away with discounting labor by pocketing money owed to the employees does it. There are smart ways and dumb ways to do this violation. But payroll fraud is a dumb way. That is my prediction, that is my opinion. This type of bullshit is what makes Bob a total idiot, you don’t get away with tis shit in the long run. And they have no reason to be doing this stuff based on their economy of scale, maybe it helped in the bootstrap process to get the company to growth, but to continue a violation such as this is like driving without insurance. 7/23/2011: VIDEO BLOG UPDATE ON LAWSUIT: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UcALf6HOsQ Godaddy’s genius defense strategy fails big time. Poor Bob and the Wall Street buddies, and his billion and a half dollars over in the sandbox and the Courts don’t want to listen to him whine about how he is a “victim of his employees.” Nor will the court allow for the prolonged scorched earth torturing of employees. Or will the Court allow Godaddy to operate a secret “protective order” lawsuit in the public Courts. Godaddy gets nothing that it asks for. Godaddy lands in the wrong Court to play its games in. We did very well in Court. We are now full discovery without limitations! Court says our case is simple and should be resolved quickly. JUDGES ORDER INCLUDE MANDATORY GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT TALKS (PDF) How_to_Calculate_OT.htmlChargebackconsultant.com_files/OB4997%7E1.pdfhttp://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/finding_apps_for_the_shadow_economy/http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/finding_apps_for_the_shadow_economy/Chargebackconsultant.com_files/OB4997%7E1_1.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Statement%20of%20Decision%20re%20Unconscionability.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/TrialBriefPhase2Final1SignedConformed.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/IBD%27s%20Trial%20Brief%20Re%20Unconscionability.pdfhttp://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/Governor_signs_Wage_Theft_Protection_Act_of_2011.htmlhttp://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/asm/ab_0451-0500/ab_469_bill_20111009_chaptered.pdfhttp://www.employmentlawwatch.com/2011/11/articles/employment-us/us-californias-wage-theft-prevention-act-imposes-new-requirements-and-potential-penalties-on-private-employers-starting-january-1-2012/http://www.employmentlawwatch.com/2011/11/articles/employment-us/us-californias-wage-theft-prevention-act-imposes-new-requirements-and-potential-penalties-on-private-employers-starting-january-1-2012/http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=87de1cf4-a70e-42b3-9bec-cd97b0263d72Chargebackconsultant.com_files/Defendants%20First%20Set%20of%20Requests%0D%0A%20for%20Production%20to%20all%20Plaintiffs.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/14-main.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/14-1.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Godaddy%20AZ%20Unem.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/leavetoamend.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/redlineamend.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/CalculatingRates.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/loronabill892010.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/noopposition.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/currentdocket824.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/drain%20on%20the%20system.mp3Chargebackconsultant.com_files/USPS%20-%20Track%20%26%20Confirm.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Some%20call%20him%20Bob%20but%20you%20can%20call%20him%20Rob.mp3Chargebackconsultant.com_files/IRS%20OGDEN.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/godaddy%20-%20Google%20Search.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/godaddylosses.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Motion2dissmiss.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Motion2dissmiss.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/OrderIBDWrit.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/OrderIBDWrit.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/responsetomtd.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/responsetomtd.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/NewGDdocket.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/GDReplymtd.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/GDStrike.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Godaddyirs.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Godaddyirs.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Godaddyirs.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/show_temp-13.pl.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/show_temp-13.pl_1.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/show_temp-15.pl.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/show_temp-16.pl.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/show_temp-17.pl.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/show_temp-17.pl.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/CM%3AECF%20-%20azd.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/CM%3AECF%20-%20azd.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Apperance.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Apperance.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/XoquGL-show_temp.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/XoquGL-show_temp.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Second%20Amended%20Complaint.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/order%20moot.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Godaddy%20answer.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Order%20Case%20Management.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/CM%3AECF%20-%20azd_1.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/GDNEWCOUNSEL.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/GDNEWCOUNSEL2.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/GDNEWCOUNSEL3.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/GODADDY%20BUYS%20NODADDY.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Nodaddy%20private.pdfhttp://domainincite.com/confirmed-go-daddy-bought-nodaddy-com/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/12/godaddy_shuts_down_nodaddy/http://forms.theregister.co.uk/mail_author/?story_url=/2011/07/12/godaddy_shuts_down_nodaddy/http://www.theregister.co.uk/networks/hosting/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/12/http://go.theregister.com/tl/507/-1993/sade-5tnqyy-r3-en.pdf?td=wptl507http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/03/godaddy_gets_investors/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/03/godaddy_gets_investors/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/21/go_daddy_class_action_suit/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/21/go_daddy_class_action_suit/Chargebackconsultant.com_files/Case%20Management%20report.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Plaintiff%20Disclosure.pdfChargebackconsultant.com_files/Defendants%20disclosure.pdfhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UcALf6HOsQChargebackconsultant.com_files/CASE%20MANAGEMENT%20ORDER.pdffile://localhost/Users/tobyharris/Music/iTunes/iTunes%20Media/Music/MC%20Opinionator/Toby%20Harris's%20Album/drain%20on%20the%20system%202.mp3shapeimage_2_link_0shapeimage_2_link_1shapeimage_2_link_2shapeimage_2_link_3shapeimage_2_link_4shapeimage_2_link_5shapeimage_2_link_6shapeimage_2_link_7shapeimage_2_link_8shapeimage_2_link_9shapeimage_2_link_10shapeimage_2_link_11shapeimage_2_link_12shapeimage_2_link_13shapeimage_2_link_14shapeimage_2_link_15shapeimage_2_link_16shapeimage_2_link_17shapeimage_2_link_18shapeimage_2_link_19shapeimage_2_link_20shapeimage_2_link_21shapeimage_2_link_22shapeimage_2_link_23shapeimage_2_link_24shapeimage_2_link_25shapeimage_2_link_26shapeimage_2_link_27shapeimage_2_link_28shapeimage_2_link_29shapeimage_2_link_30shapeimage_2_link_31shapeimage_2_link_32shapeimage_2_link_33shapeimage_2_link_34shapeimage_2_link_35shapeimage_2_link_36shapeimage_2_link_37shapeimage_2_link_38shapeimage_2_link_39shapeimage_2_link_40shapeimage_2_link_41shapeimage_2_link_42shapeimage_2_link_43shapeimage_2_link_44shapeimage_2_link_45shapeimage_2_link_46shapeimage_2_link_47shapeimage_2_link_48shapeimage_2_link_49shapeimage_2_link_50shapeimage_2_link_51shapeimage_2_link_52shapeimage_2_link_53shapeimage_2_link_54shapeimage_2_link_55shapeimage_2_link_56shapeimage_2_link_57shapeimage_2_link_58shapeimage_2_link_59shapeimage_2_link_60shapeimage_2_link_61shapeimage_2_link_62shapeimage_2_link_63shapeimage_2_link_64shapeimage_2_link_65shapeimage_2_link_66shapeimage_2_link_67shapeimage_2_link_68shapeimage_2_link_69shapeimage_2_link_70shapeimage_2_link_71shapeimage_2_link_72shapeimage_2_link_73shapeimage_2_link_74shapeimage_2_link_75shapeimage_2_link_76shapeimage_2_link_77

GODADDY EMPLOYEE LAWSUIT INFORMATION


7/24/2011: FBI COMPLAINT FILED REQUESTING GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATION INTO GODADDY PAYROLL PRACTICES FOR ALLEGED FRAUDULENT SCHEMES:


File #2


8/5/2011:  CURRENT DOCKET, MARK THIERMAN FILES HIS PRO HAC VICE PAPERS


8/12/2011: The Court on it’s own motion reassigns Corbin v. Godaddy to a new Judge.  The Judge is a “Senior Judge” who used to be the Chief Judge of the AZ Federal Courts.  In fact Murray Snow was his replacement.  A Senior Judge is a “semi retired” Judge who has a half case load.  The Court most likely did this as there are more important case which need to be at bar.  And our case is mainly just a discovery based case, meaning Godaddy won’t admit to anything until we pull their records and put them on the public record.  Then they will begin to notice such things as “payroll fraud” and deceptive indicators on the pay-stub as we pull all the data and then show it to them and questions them on it.


Just a bullshit cat and mouse game that arrogant billionaires like to play.  They get caught stealing, try to cover it up and pretend they are doing nothing wrong as we yank their own people for questioning and their own data.  Why do they do this?  I have no idea it only gets them in deeper trouble.  But I guess billionaires need some weird form of entertainment, and watching the villagers fight over wages that amount to peanuts, is riveting top notch entertainment.  It’s shameful for them to do this.  But until the Courts and the Feds actually start arresting executives they will continue to play this game of “Robbing the employee piggy bank for millions” Bottom line, is if they stole millions of dollars from a bank they would all be in a prison cell.  I am an advocate of putting billionaires who steal millions from the employee that made them the billions, in prison.


We filed a motion to let the Court know we served Godaddy with discovery:

Discovery (PDF)


Why this wasn’t placed on the record I have no idea.  But I do have all the discovery requests that were served on Godaddy.  I’ll check but I don’t see any problem with posting them.  So let me clear with the attorneys and I will post them up here.


BTW- I will have Bob Parsons and each KKR member and Silver partners all deposed.  Let me repeat that, ALL GODADDDY OWNERS WILL BE DEPOSED, ALL OF YOU, EVERY LAST ONE OF YOU WILL ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT WHY YOU ENFORCE THIS POLICY AND WHY THE ACCOUNTING DOES NOT ADD UP.  And all the relevant executives.  I will have it video taped and I will post those depositions.  SO I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT GAME YOU GUYS ARE PLAYING, BUT YOU WILL BE EXPOSED BY DEPOSITIONS, FOR ALL OF THE WALL STREET MARKET MAKERS TO SEE.  THIS LAWSUIT DOES NOT FAVOR YOU OR YOU’RE DUMB GAMES.  SMARTEN UP, BILLIONAIRES MAKE THE SAME NOISE AS ELEPHANTS WHEN THEY FALL DOWN.


8/13/2011:  Okay I am going to post up all the discovery request documents and let Godaddys attorneys call over to our attorneys on Monday and whine and complain about what we asked them to produce and why it’s publicly posted, but I feel you guys are entitled to see what is going on and what evidence they are required to produce. 


Remember Bob Parsons made this bed, and he has to lie in it.  And he has no problem lying:


First NUI.pdf (pdf)

First RFP.pdf (pdf)

FirstRFA.pdf (pdf)


They need to produce all this stuff in 30 days.  And then it is all downhill for Godaddy, because nothing in discovery favors them or their position of “denial”


Iowa employees, we have you covered, we are required to produce a Motion for Certification by late September which the Judge already said would be approved which then binds all the employees as a certified class.  Then Godaddy has the uphill battle of trying to decertify or reverse the class certification.  If you are keeping score right now, the employees are winning big time.


9/18/2011 Employees have decided to proceed with prosecution and to proceed to trial.  Stay tuned the deposition rounds are coming up and we are calling Bob Parsons as a witness.


The Court has set a strict calendar and we will reach trial quickly.


9/19/2011 RECENT FILINGS (PDF)


10/28/2011 Okay what are Bob Parsons attorneys up to, well they filed this the other day:

Bob attempts cover up.pdf



So let’s see what they are griping about, they basically are saying that only 5 “disgruntled” employees are involved and that the other 4700+ employees (past and present) don’t care about the lawsuit and have not joined so there is no support (umm they care about money that belongs to them, they really do.).  The problem with that position is that we have not given the other employees the opportunity to join, which must be done by Court notice, and the Court actually orders this.  So basically a mailer will go out in the mail which is called “Opt in” and employees (and former employees going back a few years) will sign it and mail it back in, then that will determine the total class size and people that want Bob Parsons to pay back what he owes.  The mailer will say something to the effect that this is a class action and you sign up you agree to the terms of the class action, if you want to sue Bob Parsons on your own, you can “Opt out” and go get your own attorneys, yada yada....It’s standard boiler plate stuff, it’s in the pdf above if you guys want to read it.


(BTW I don't need to mention Bob is worth over $1.5 billion dollars, that is $100million x 15 just to give you an idea that he can certainly afford to pay this lawsuit and even have some extra money left over to buy beer, car insurance “notice Steve Jobs also had a problem with auto registration”, chips and another elephant killing safari.  So nobody should feel guilty in the least about signing the document and having Bob cut you a check for what he owes you.  Oh and the truly funny part is if Bob pays this lawsuit off in full with all the penalties he will still be worth $1.5 billion, it won’t even affect his net worth.)


They also say that the Iowa employees which number about 500 are in full compliance and there is no way for us to know if they aren’t since none are in the lawsuit, well we have the recruiting ads which are identical, and we have the ability to do discovery, so they gain nothing here.  So they are trying to omit Iowa employees, again the Court will include them and then allow for Godaddy to try to decertify the case, which wont work on a Federal OT case, but whatever Bob has a problem, so we will let him play in his sandbox.


Oh also they mention this website, which is bizarre.  They don’t want you to understand your rights, so they bought NODADDY to shut me up and now they have a problem with this website.  Look I pay the hosting and domain registration which is at Godaddy so that is actually mitigating their damages.  If the lawsuit is say $10million and the case pends 2.5 years then they offset the total lawsuit cost by me having this website and pocket the $80 or $100 bucks which was an expense for me, which in turn I ask the Court to award me in double damages.  But the idea is Bob has my money and can spend it on airplane fuel or whatever he runs his race-cars on, until we finish the lawsuit, then he can pay it back, kind of like a loan with high usury rates that is Court ordered...


But Bob this website is for sale for the same amount you paid for NODADDY, and I have no idea what that was but I will agree to sell it to Godaddy for the exact amount just show me the amount paid to Fyodor and his sidekick and I will turn over the files and stop tying this stuff in here.  Then you can go back to pretending you don’t have legal problems and are a good guy.